The platform, the vendors, the delivery organization and the cost line addressed together — because changing any one of them alone is how transformation programs stall in year two.
WHO THIS IS FOR
Companies carrying a platform that no longer fits where the business is going, and a technology cost line nobody can fully explain. Often ahead of a capital event or an acquisition, or in front of a board that has lost patience with the roadmap.
THE PROBLEM
Transformation is usually scoped as a technology project and funded as a capital project, then runs straight into the operating model nobody agreed to change. Eighteen months in, the platform is half-migrated, the old system is still running, and both are being paid for.
A written read on the platform, the spend and the delivery organization, with a sequenced plan behind it.
Ownership of the transformation through delivery, reporting to the board on an agreed cadence.
A program already underway and off track: re-baselined, re-sequenced and driven to a finish.
Engagements run on Genexis ARC, our four-stage method from readiness to run-rate. Process and data work is mapped to APQC’s Process Classification Framework, which makes the baseline comparable rather than anecdotal, with ITIL 4 where service operations are being standardized.
Scope and fees are set on a fit call, once the shape of the problem is clear.
Business units consolidated onto a single technology platform, and more than $1B in acquisition value integrated across public and private companies.
That is usually a sign ‘the problem’ is worth an hour of conversation before anyone scopes anything.
Start a conversation